The European Union (EU) Commission has formally withdrawn two legislative draft proposals aimed at establishing regulatory oversight over standard-essential patent (SEP) licensing and civil liability for artificial intelligence (AI) products. This withdrawal reflects the ongoing tensions between tech industry stakeholders and consumer advocates, with concerns about fragmented rules and potential market distortions.
No Consensus Leads to Withdrawal of SEP and AI Liability Frameworks
In September 2022, the EU Commission published a draft proposal for an AI Liability Directive intended to adapt non-contractual civil liability rules to AI providers. This directive sought to create a unified framework to address damages caused by AI systems, preventing the fragmentation of liability rules across EU member states. Similarly, in April 2023, the EU Commission proposed a regulatory framework for SEP licensing, which would have mandated registration with the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and included essentiality checks for patents incorporated into technological standards.
Both proposals faced significant opposition from industry insiders and advocacy groups. Critics argued that the SEP regulation would erode fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) licensing obligations by enabling large companies to collectively dictate royalty rates. Additionally, the AI Liability Directive was criticized for leaving gaps in accountability, particularly for black-box medical AI systems where independent assessment of AI outputs is challenging.
EU Commission Cites Lack of Agreement Among Member States as Reason for Withdrawal
The EU Commission cited a lack of foreseeable agreement among member states as the primary reason for withdrawing both proposals. Henna Virkkunen, the EU Commission’s Executive Vice-President for Tech Sovereignty, Security, and Democracy, stated that the AI Liability Directive would have led to fragmented rules across EU member states. She emphasized the need for full implementation of the AI Act - a comprehensive regulatory framework effective in the EU last August - before rewriting liability rules.
Reactions from Stakeholders
The withdrawal of the AI Liability Directive was met with mixed reactions. While tech industry groups, including the Council for Innovation Promotion (C4IP) and IPWatchdog, welcomed the decision, consumer advocates expressed concern over the potential loss of enforcement mechanisms against non-compliance with the AI Act. The European Consumer Organisation (ECO), the European Center for Not-for-Profit Law, and the Mozilla Foundation released an open letter urging the EU Commission to reintroduce liability rules without delay.
Impact on Businesses and Market Dynamics
The withdrawal of these proposals has significant implications for businesses operating in the EU’s AI market. Many EU lawmakers initially resisted the decision, with members of the European Parliament’s Internal Market and Consumer Protection Committee continuing to advocate for updated liability rules. The EU Commission’s emphasis on full implementation of the AI Act before revisiting liability frameworks reflects a broader focus on ensuring compliance and fostering innovation while balancing industry interests and consumer protections.
Future Outlook: Collaboration and Standardization
The EU Commission’s decision highlights the complexity of crafting regulations that satisfy diverse interests within the tech sector. As AI technologies continue to evolve, businesses must collaborate with policymakers to establish clear guidelines and avoid regulatory fragmentation. The withdrawal of these proposals serves as a reminder of the challenges in creating cohesive frameworks that address both industry concerns and consumer rights, underscoring the need for careful balancing and inclusive decision-making.
Image Credit
Image: Deposit Photos ID: 35711349